Product →Examples →FAQ →All solutions →About →
Business problemsHow it worksRolesOrganizations
Scopeout for product research

Ask a question. Get a cited brief.

Research reads your replays, tickets, analytics and docs, plans the work, asks permission, and returns a brief where every claim links to its source.

Plan · asks first
Pull 142 replays, 38 tickets
Walk the mobile checkout
Rank hypotheses
Approve

Research that shows its work

No summaries you have to trust. Every finding cites the replay, ticket or number it came from.

Plan first, then run

The canvas proposes the steps and waits for approval. You see what it will read before it reads it.

“Why do users abandon the address step?” · asks before it runs
Pull 142 replays and 38 tickets
Walk the mobile checkout
Rank the causes
Approve

Evidence from every source

Replays, tickets, analytics, docs, and a browser agent for anything with a URL, gathered into one brief.

Connected · read in place, cited
GA4MixpanelZendeskIntercomFigmaStorybookGitHubGitLabNotionSlackBrowser agent
Not connected yet?the browser agent gathers evidence from any URL

Findings as blocks

Causes, quotes and numbers land on the canvas as blocks the team can rank, comment on and turn into work.

Findings · as blocks on the canvas
Address lookup fails on mobile0.81
Zip keyboard type0.62
Form feels long0.40
Each blockcited · commentable · turns into work

Built for research work

Experience map · onboarding
Land100%
Sign up82%
Connect44%
First report27%
Reconstructed fromreal sessions

Experience maps

Journeys reconstructed from real sessions, with drop-offs and quotes at each stage.

Pricing page teardown · us vs two competitors
UsAcmeBolt
Free tier
Annual toggle default
Price anchoring
Social proof above fold
Gaps2 · both captured as screens on the canvas

Competitor teardowns

A browser agent walks competitor flows and lays screens side by side with the gaps listed.

Heuristic audit · signup · 6 screens, worst first
Step 2 · password4.1
Step 4 · company6.2
Step 1 · email7.8
Step 6 · done9.1
Top fixinline errors on step 2

Heuristic audits

Every screen scored against usability heuristics, with the top fix per screen.

Research library · this product
Briefs24
Interviews6 studies · 58 users
Teardowns4 competitors
Last used byDesign · yesterday

A living research library

Every brief stays on the canvas. The next question starts from what you already know.

AI-moderated interviews · 12 users who abandoned checkout
Did not trust the address lookup8
Wanted Apple Pay first5
Form felt long on mobile4
“I typed my street and it suggested a different city, so I gave up.”clip 04 · 0:42

AI-moderated research on any topic

Interviews and surveys run by Scout, with follow-ups, on any question you have. Themes come back with cited clips and quotes.

Before recruiting anyone
Read existing replays and tickets
Check analytics for the answer
Only then propose a study
Resultfewer studies, better questions

Evidence first, then the study

It reads what you already have before recruiting anyone, so a study only runs when the data cannot answer.

Start from a prompt.

Diagnose

“Why do users abandon the address step on mobile? Rank the causes with evidence.”

Run this when my batch opens →
Interview

“Interview twelve customers who churned last month about why they left and summarise the themes.”

Run this when my batch opens →
Teardown

“Compare our pricing page with three competitors and list the gaps.”

Run this when my batch opens →

Questions, answered.

What does “cited” mean here?

Every claim in a brief links to the replay, ticket, analytics query or page it came from. Click to verify.

Does it need our researchers’ documents?

It helps. Connect Notion, Confluence or Drive and the canvas uses past research as context.

Can research run without approval?

It always plans first and asks. You can lower the bar per team once you trust it.

Stop running the business. Start directing it.

Join the waitlist

Private beta. We onboard teams in small batches. Or contact us.